|||  Journal title: Audiology | Publisher: Tehran University of Medical Sciences | Website: http://aud.tums.ac.ir | Email: aud@tums.ac.ir   |||
   [Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Registration :: Submission :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Contact :: Search ::
:: Volume 20, Issue 2 (29 2011) ::
aud 2011, 20(2): 22-29 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of gap in noise test results between congenital blind and sighted subjects with normal hearing
Mahsa Sepehrnejad1, Ghassem Mohammadkhani1, Saeed Farahani1, Soghrat Faghihzadeh2, Mohammad Hossein Nilforoush Khoshk3
1- Department of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
2- Department of Biostatistics, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
3- Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Abstract:   (9590 Views)

Background and Aims: Main feature of auditory processing abilities is temporal processing including temporal resolution, temporal ordering, temporal integration and temporal masking. Many studies have shown the superiority of blinds in temporal discrimination over sighted subjects. In this study, temporal processing was compared in congenital blind subjects with sighted controls via gap in noise test (GIN).
Methods: This analytic-prescriptive non-invasive cohort study was conducted on 22 congenital blinds (11 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 26.22 years and 22 sighted control subjects (11 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 24.04 years with normal hearing in faculty of Rehabilitation Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Gap in noise test results, approximate threshold and percent of corrected answers, were obtained and then, were analyzed by Mann-Whitney non-parametric statistical test.
Results: There was a significant difference in the approximate threshold and the percent of corrected answers between congenital blinds and sighted control subjects (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between males and females in this regard (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Auditory temporal resolution ability, the lower approximate threshold and the more corrected answers in gap in noise, in blind subjects is better than the sighted control group and it might be related to the compensative neuroplasticity after visual deprivation.

Keywords: Temporal processing, temporal resolution, gap in noise test, blindness, neuroplasticity
Full-Text [PDF 194 kb]   |   Full Text (HTML)   (3564 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2010/10/5 | Accepted: 2011/04/19 | Published: 2013/10/14
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 20, Issue 2 (29 2011) Back to browse issues page
شنوایی شناسی - دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران Bimonthly Audiology - Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.13 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 4610